Reasoning Theory for D3L with Compositional Bridge Rules
نویسندگان
چکیده
The semantic mapping in Distributed Dynamic Description Logics(D3L) allows knowledge to propagate from one ontology to another. The current research for knowledge propagation in D3L is only for a simplified case when only two ontologies are involved. In this paper we study knowledge propagation in more complex cases. We find in the case when more than two ontologies are involved and bridge rules form chains, knowledge does not always propagate along chains of bridge rules even if we would expect it. Inspired by Package-based description Logics, we extend the original semantics of D3L by imposing so called compositional consistency condition on domain relations in D3L interpretations. Under this semantics knowledge propagates along chains of bridge rules correctly. Furthermore we provide a distributed Tableaux reasoning algorithm for deciding satisfiability of concepts which is decidable in D3L under compositional consistency. Compared with original one, the extended D3L provides more reasonable logic foundation for distributed, dynamic system such as the information integration system and the Semantic Web.
منابع مشابه
Towards Distributed Tableaux Reasoning Procedure for DDL with Increased Subsumption Propagation between Remote Ontologies
Distributed Description Logics (DDL) enable reasoning with multiple ontologies interconnected by directional semantic mapping. In DDL semantic mapping is indicated by so called bridge rules. There are two kinds: intoand onto-bridge rules. Mappings between concepts allow subsumption to propagate from one ontology to another. However, in some cases, especially when more than two local ontologies ...
متن کاملAutomatic Derivation of Compositional Rules in Automated Compositional Reasoning
Soundness of compositional reasoning rules depends on computational models and sometimes is rather involved. Since it is tedious to establish new rules, verifiers are forced to mould verification problems into a handful of proof rules available to them. In this paper, a syntactic approach to establishing soundness of proof rules in automated compositional reasoning is shown. Not only can our wo...
متن کاملAn Extension of Distributed Dynamic Description Logics for the Representation of Heterogeneous Mappings
As a family of dynamic description logics, DDL(X) is constructed by embracing actions into the description logic X, where X represents well-studied description logics ranging from the ALC to the SHOIQ. To efficiently support automated interoperability between ontology-based information systems in distributed environments, we have to design an expressive mapping language to semantically understa...
متن کاملCompositional Reasoning for Hardware/Software Co-verification
In this paper, we present and illustrate an approach to compositional reasoning for hardware/software co-verification of embedded systems. The major challenges in compositional reasoning for co-verification include: (1) the hardware/software semantic gaps, (2) lack of common property specification languages for hardware and software, and (3) lack of compositional reasoning rules that are applic...
متن کاملAugmenting Subsumption Propagation in Distributed Description Logics
Distributed Description Logics (DDL) enable reasoning with multiple ontologies interconnected by directional semantic mapping, called bridge rules. Bridge rules map concepts of a source ontology into concepts of a target ontology. Concept subsumptions of the source ontology can be propagated according to a propagation pattern expressed by bridge rules into concept subsumptions of the target ont...
متن کامل